Former Andhra Pradesh CM Criticizes Naidu's Governance

By A Staff Reporter — Vijayawada: Former Andhra Pradesh Chief Minister YS Jagan Mohan Reddy leveled strong criticisms at Chandrababu Naidu's administration, highlighting what he described as mismanagement, unfulfilled promises, and escalating violence against women. Speaking in Vijayawada, Reddy accused Naidu of neglecting key responsibilities and pushing Andhra Pradesh toward economic instability.

Reddy began by alleging that Naidu’s government removed nearly 2 lakh volunteers and numerous employees from the Beverage Corporation within the first six months of his tenure, which he says has disrupted essential services and affected livelihoods. Furthermore, he claimed that Naidu’s promised monthly pension of Rs 3,000 for unemployed youth has failed to reach its intended recipients, with little transparency or progress in the distribution process.

One of Reddy's central concerns was the financial trajectory of the state. He asserted that Naidu frequently visits the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) to secure loans, totaling a projected Rs 68,742 crore. “Every Tuesday, Chandrababu Naidu allegedly visits the RBI to borrow money for the state instead of creating wealth,” Reddy stated, questioning if this dependence on borrowing could lead Andhra Pradesh toward a debt crisis similar to that of Sri Lanka. He argued that rather than building the state's resources, Naidu’s strategy is to burden it with unsustainable debt.

Additionally, Reddy expressed alarm at what he described as a worrying rise in violence against women under Naidu’s rule. He reported that in the span of five months, there have been more than 110 incidents of assault against women, with 11 fatalities. Reddy claims that sexual assault cases have surged significantly, criticizing the government’s inability to ensure public safety.

In his address, Reddy portrayed Naidu’s governance as one that has “betrayed every section of society.” His remarks reflect the growing political rivalry in Andhra Pradesh as both leaders vie to highlight contrasting visions for the state’s future.